I didnt have to export anything, or bake in lights, and i could just walk around in real time. So, (in terms of my ORIGINAL need of walkaround and presentation modes), that was the decision maker. Somewhere in there, when i started Parallax Team, we suddenly had GPU's that could handle our models in Enscape. The Export Time was a big drawback for me, as my models tend to be very large, and the sheer amount of time needed to export models and all their sheets, basically meant i didnt have time to ever export, even with spare machines. At the TIME, i wasnt looking for a coordination tool, so that was less appealing to me (personally), although it worked great. Revizto starting gaining a lot of new features and functionality related to Project Coordination (marking up sheets (if you exported sheets), measuring, issue tracking, etc). I was still using Revizto, as it was much easier on the GPU (it wasnt rendering in real time, since it was an export), and the company i was at had lesser-than GPU's. It was great for this, and there wasnt anything else (besides custom solutions) really doing it (Enscape wasnt really around yet, or if it was, it wasnt very widely known).Ī short while later, enscape was out for realtime walkthroughs. My intent with it was to use it strictly as a presentation/navigation/project-review tool, since it offered WASD walkarounds, in models. I originally started using Revizto when it first came out. However, I think it has similar problems to Revit in that it will mangle the axes.I think they do some things that are similar, but then they do other things very different. To add to the party, FreeCAD also imports grids successfully. This data detail may not seem like much to a user who just wants to visually see results, but it is actually pretty important if we want to rely on IFC as a reliable data store. In your particular example, this doesn’t matter, but in others, it will. It also generates a new representation for the Grid itself (not each individual axis). Note: tested with Revit 2020, latest IFC add-on. The BlenderBIM Add-on preserves this in the outliner (and also supports WAxes). In the original, UAxes are A and B, and VAxes are 1 and 2, but Revit will generate its own. For example, it has reset the name of the grid to “Default Grid”, and it has actually reversed the U axes and the V axes. In contrast, Revit may “look” visually like grids, but actually it has destroyed the underlying data. Also, under the hood, it preserves styles on whether it is the U axis or V axis. So as you can see, all the data is 100% preserved. So for example, in the BlenderBIM Add-on 3D view, you only see lines, simply because that is the default style in that viewing mode (note: a future feature will be to draw labels in 3D too), but if you use the “generate drawing” mode feature in the BlenderBIM Add-on, it’ll then render out like this: In the BlenderBIM Add-on, for example, indeed you only see lines, because that is what is defined in the IFC… however, the label, (e.g. For example, you may only see lines, but actually all the data is there. You could write it without CAD software on a texteditorīricsCAD BIMgrid.ifc (3.5 an important thing to check if whether or not data is being preserved. If nobody compains (here?) that this is a standstill for ifc in the bimworld.Įdit: i added the file. So I personally can’t believe a basic thing like a straight grid line was not part of any certification process. I see a lot of fail here, sorryīimvision : looks good !! that’s the way. The only software that was able to read grids so far… is Revit… (which has a hard time deailing with coordinats). That s ok, but can we at least show them to others… To match any design in a real world 3d situation it is critical that we can rely on grids in a Country coordinat system. It seem all software have a unique way of defining grid lines. From 2015 i see ! I am not quite sure what the status is on the concencus on the academic side of gridlines, but i am still disappointed about the lack of interopability. Hi, i am picking up my old piece of research here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |